9-26-12

September 26, 2012~ Meeting Summary

Members Present: Heather, Matt, Iver, Jeremy

Topic: Writing

General Minutes:


 * What are the 5 most important observations we can make about the data?


 * 1) Huge dip in 2008
 * 2) We appear to be improving and catching up with the state.
 * 3) Never met or exceed the state – slightly below average.
 * 4) Similar scores to those with similar demographics.
 * 5) Below average scores, generally greater than our partially proficient scores.
 * 6) We do not have a majority of our students proficient.


 * What are 3 - 5 important conclusions we can draw from the data?


 * 1) There is no data to suggest that our teaching practices affect these scores.
 * 2) It appears that the level of proficient students is increasing but the students below are remaining constant.
 * 3) We need a plan for students who are below proficiency.


 * What are some barriers (out of our control) that have an effect on the data?


 * 1) Demographic changes/shifts
 * 2) Home support/value of the SAT/education
 * 3) The test days and effects of standardized testing on students (NWEAs).


 * What are some assets we have that will inform, support and/or guide our work?


 * 1) Literacy Initiative (Not sure of direct effects on writing)
 * 2) Writing Lab (Unsure it will operate as planned)
 * 3) Collective brain power J


 * What are some next steps we should take as a staff in our PLG's?


 * 1) What are the Common Core writing requirements?
 * 2) What are specific components of writing that our students are struggling with?
 * 3) Identify what form of writing are we hoping to improve.
 * 4) Research to see how other schools are handling this writing.


 * What instructional strategies or approaches could we use individually or collaboratively to improve the data?


 * 1) Regular timed writing in various contents based on the Common Core requirements.
 * 2) Share effective writing strategies.
 * 3) Encourage writing across the curriculum.